nuggets from the more th>n living archive

Insider

Archives

Sleeping satellites — Iridium 33 and Kosmos 2251 collide

There are more than enough bits of space junk in orbit around our planet, ran­ging from defunct satel­lites to, at one point last Novem­ber, NASA astronaut’s toolkit. For the most part they’re no threat to us down here on the sur­face, as all but the largest tend to dis­in­teg­rate on re-​​entry into the earth’s atmo­sphere, but they are some­thing of a risk to space sta­tions and vehicles like the shuttle.

The good news is, then, that since Tues­day there have been two fewer large orbit­ing objects – a result of a high-​​speed col­li­sion between two com­mu­nic­a­tion satel­lites. The bad news is that said two objects have been reduced to sev­eral hun­dred smal­ler ones, the number and path of which nobody is yet able to predict.

The explos­ive smash happened 485 miles above the earth’s sur­face, when a live US satel­lite and a decom­mis­sioned Rus­sian one crossed paths over Siberia.

It’s hard to grasp just how unlikely such a col­li­sion is, and how hard the two must have hit each other. Satel­lites in a low-​​earth orbit (LEO), as both Iridium 33 and Kosmos 2251 were, are sub­ject to almost the same grav­ity as they would be on the planet’s sur­face, so they need to travel at huge speeds to avoid simply being claimed by the earth.

Really huge speeds: a typ­ical LEO orbital velo­city is above 17,000 miles per hour, or more than 30 times the speed of an air­liner. While the two satel­lites might not have hit each other head on, even the most gentle of nudges would have seen them close on each other at a daunt­ing rate. A head-​​on smash would have brought them together at more than nine miles per second.

Trying to work out the amount of energy involved in that kind of crash makes me want to lie down in a dark room. The BBC says that Iridium 33 weighed 560kg and that Kosmos 2251 tipped the scales at 950kg. Some rough cal­cu­la­tions tell me that smash­ing the two satel­lites together could release as much energy as explod­ing 22 tonnes of TNT.

Which makes the BBC’s anim­ated recon­struc­tion seem just a little quaint.

IMAGE by Flickr user Mulad

Sim­ilar Posts:

Ori­gin­ally posted 2009-​​02-​​12 17:24:00. Repub­lished by Blog Post Promoter

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Print
  • email
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
  • PDF
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Wikio
  • Propeller
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Posterous
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
blog comments powered by Disqus